|
| Author |
Message |
ebonX
User is Offline
Joined: 17 Jun 2007
Posts: 348
Location: Fremont, CA
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
@ RobC - Thanks for the "play-by-play"
@ nnnik - Nice Catch! Spotting Michael (aka KJ) in the freightie crowd ... I will have to rewatch the ep.
_________________
"Destiny is a fickle bitch!" - Benjamin Linus |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Scott H
User is Offline
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 29
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How can people still not think Aaron is one of the 6??
We now know all of them:
Sun, Hurley, Sayid, Jack, Kate and Aaron.
_________________
www.darkhabits.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ebonX
User is Offline
Joined: 17 Jun 2007
Posts: 348
Location: Fremont, CA
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
@ Scott H,
To be fair to those who are still questioning who the 6th member of "O6" is, there are still holes in the "Oceanic 6" story ...
(A) Jack stated (in "Eggtown") that 8 people survived the crash. 2 of those 8 died post-crash/pre-rescue, according to the "O6" cover-story.
(B) The issue of Aaron's age discrepancy (4 to 5 months) comes up if Kate was pregnant at the time of the crash.
My thinking is that "they" (whoever were involved in creating the "O6" cover-story) simply doctored the passenger manifest to include Aaron as a newborn on the flight ... That makes Aaron 1 of the 8 initial crash survivors & thus fits the "O6" story. This still leaves a month or 2 age discrepancy with Aaron, but I think that can be easily hidden from the general public.
_________________
"Destiny is a fickle bitch!" - Benjamin Linus |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Col
User is Offline
Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Posts: 18
Location: California
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 10:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So Aaron in the doctored manifest is Kate's kid? Does he wear mini handcuffs?  Or is he Claire's? Either way, I don't see that as a possibility...
What I mean is, if he's Kate and born already, the US government would have known about it, if it was Claire's the family waiting to adopt would know otherwise. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mark B
User is Offline
Joined: 10 Feb 2008
Posts: 199
Location: Perth, WA (via Texas and UK)
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 12:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
This Aaron is one of the six and Kate has presented him as her own needs some serious explaination by TPTB.
Much as it pains me to say I think we need another Kate flashforward just not as far.
_________________
Mark B.
<insert slightly amusing one liner or meaningful famous quote here > |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Scott H
User is Offline
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 29
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 1:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, I see what your saying about time frames. But like I said, no-ones going to say much when there are 4 people saying the baby is Kate's...
I don't think the passenger list would have been doctored though.
_________________
www.darkhabits.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ninjitsu Chicken
User is Offline
Joined: 11 Feb 2008
Posts: 10
Location: India
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wonder who's to blame for announcing Harold Perrineau's return to LOST way back at comic con... but after that reveal, there weren't that many choices left on where he (Michael) would turn up... sailing back like Desmond would have been lame...
how awesome would it have been had this not been the most predictable "reveal" in the history of LOST...
Ah well....
I think theres no disputing the fact that Sun believes that Jin's dead... even if you think someone is trapped in some hard to reach corner of the space time continuum you wouldn't be visiting a grave to "meet" them...
Plus.. This has to be the most .. er... "recent" flash forward ever right? not more just about six months from the "current" events!
I liked the episode anyway... bettter than the last one and my fav Sun/Jin episode till date... too bad about the lame Michael reveal...
_________________
thus spake Ninjitsu Chicken... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
opsin
User is Offline
Joined: 15 Mar 2008
Posts: 9
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 11:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't believe Gault, that the saboteur wrecked the engines.
Sayid said the banging wasn't that of fixing something, and Gault said the crew were working round the clock to fix it, but we've seen them spend an awful lot of time up on deck mooching around if that's the case. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chris in Fort Worth
User is Offline
Joined: 10 Feb 2008
Posts: 198
Location: Fort Worth, TX
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ninjitsu Chicken wrote: |
I wonder who's to blame for announcing Harold Perrineau's return to LOST way back at comic con... but after that reveal, there weren't that many choices left on where he (Michael) would turn up... sailing back like Desmond would have been lame...
how awesome would it have been had this not been the most predictable "reveal" in the history of LOST...
Ah well....
|
I guess they simply didn't feel it would be possible to keep us from finding out that Perrineau had returned. But it does seem like they could have tried...not make the announcement at comic con, keep his name out of the credits, film his scenes discreetly and hope for the best.
Ah well indeed, it would have been great.
_________________
"I dust a bit...in addition, I am at the moment writing a lengthy indictment against our century. When my brain begins to reel from my literary labors, I make an occasional cheese dip."
~ Ignatius J. Reilly |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
