|
| Author |
Message |
phil_m
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 11:06 pm Post subject: Danielle |
|
|
Obviously not dead.
They would never kill her off and not give her a proper goodbye shot, or thought....
she'll probably meet the sawyer/claire group as the return to the beach.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
suburbanhood
User is Offline
Joined: 11 Feb 2008
Posts: 46
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 6:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
I origanlly thought she was dead but with them killing Alex i think Danielle will still be alive and when she finds out Alex is dead she will start working for Ben to kill the frieghties
_________________
The others are Cylons |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Brewski
User is Offline
Joined: 17 Mar 2008
Posts: 79
Location: ireland
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
not dead, they wouldve showed her dead body and given a confirmation of her death, like check for a pulse or something if she were dead.
_________________
108 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Matt Lafferty
User is Offline
Joined: 11 Feb 2008
Posts: 171
Location: Point Pleasant, NJ
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 10:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'll be a slightly weak writing point if Carl is dead-dead and Danielle is dead-not (to paraphrase Mr. Borat). Whatever the healing properties of the island, Carl has presumably been there about as long as Danielle (16 years or so), if you figure that Carl was roughly Alex's age. How does he get a shot to the chest and dies, and Danielle gets a shot to the chest and lives?
That said, I guess the same logic we all are using about Danielle being alive could still apply to Carl. Not that I particularly care if he comes back.
_________________
"So we saved the world together for a while, and that was lovely." --Desmond |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mark B
User is Offline
Joined: 10 Feb 2008
Posts: 199
Location: Perth, WA (via Texas and UK)
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Some people die-die other people die-not.
Ms. Klugh, Ana-Lucia, Libby etc vs Mikhail (and hung Charlie in S1)
Seems the island heals those it still needs. If the island is anything like the LOST viewers it needs Danielle and Karl can take a hike.
Personally I didn't mind Karl.
_________________
Mark B.
<insert slightly amusing one liner or meaningful famous quote here > |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ebonX
User is Offline
Joined: 17 Jun 2007
Posts: 348
Location: Fremont, CA
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I actually think all 3 (Karl, Danielle, & Alex) are "dead-dead"!!
All that's left in their stories is an on-Island flashback where you see Danielle first reach the Island, her crew's sickness, and Ben's adoption/abduction of Alex ... This can easily be shown in a Ben flashback in some future ep, probably as he is hunting down Penny.
_________________
"Destiny is a fickle bitch!" - Benjamin Linus |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mark B
User is Offline
Joined: 10 Feb 2008
Posts: 199
Location: Perth, WA (via Texas and UK)
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good point ebonX, I agree. Though I would have liked to have seen it as a true Danielle falshback as I'm sure a percentage of people will look at a Ben falshback as his version of the truth which may not be the truth truth.
_________________
Mark B.
<insert slightly amusing one liner or meaningful famous quote here > |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JackedupLockedown
Site Admin
User is Offline
Joined: 07 Jun 2007
Posts: 137
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 4:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Count me amongst those who think that all there are dead and will be seen again in flashbacks throughout the next two seasons.
_________________
Jackie |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tahir
User is Offline
Joined: 11 Feb 2008
Posts: 66
Location: London, UK
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I will be totally pissed if Danielle is dead.
On the other hand, with a limited number of episodes left, maybe
there just isn't time for her story. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JackedupLockedown
Site Admin
User is Offline
Joined: 07 Jun 2007
Posts: 137
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 5:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
We'll still get her story.
_________________
Jackie |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jg
User is Offline
Joined: 09 Jun 2007
Posts: 177
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 6:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Great episode!
I "ditto" many of the remarks above, but the most startleing thing for me was the cold blooded killing of Alex. Whoa...dark. 
They are all dead (alive-not).
Rousseau's pertinent story could be revealed through a Ben Flashback. I'm sure he personally spied on the young Rousseau (pervert) in plotting to steal the baby.
_________________
"Sensitivity?….WHO CARES"- jg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Team Taskmaster
User is Offline
Joined: 27 Mar 2008
Posts: 22
Location: San Diego, CA
|
| Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mark B wrote: |
| Though I would have liked to have seen it as a true Danielle falshback as I'm sure a percentage of people will look at a Ben falshback as his version of the truth which may not be the truth truth. |
I agree with this completely. There is so much duplicity in Ben, it's hard to know if his flashes in either direction are reliable.
This brings up an interesting and somewhat trippy point: Can the characters manipulate the flashes? It's not that hard to imagine, really. People "edit" their own memories of events, enhancing and deleting portions that are pleasant or painful, filling in blanks to make the memory complete rather than allow gaps in their memory to remain.
Do the flashes show us things as they actually happened, or do they show us things as the characters recall them or wish they happened?
_________________
Go Bolts! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mark B
User is Offline
Joined: 10 Feb 2008
Posts: 199
Location: Perth, WA (via Texas and UK)
|
| Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 1:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Team Taskmaster wrote: |
| Mark B wrote: |
| Though I would have liked to have seen it as a true Danielle falshback as I'm sure a percentage of people will look at a Ben falshback as his version of the truth which may not be the truth truth. |
I agree with this completely. There is so much duplicity in Ben, it's hard to know if his flashes in either direction are reliable.
This brings up an interesting and somewhat trippy point: Can the characters manipulate the flashes? It's not that hard to imagine, really. People "edit" their own memories of events, enhancing and deleting portions that are pleasant or painful, filling in blanks to make the memory complete rather than allow gaps in their memory to remain.
Do the flashes show us things as they actually happened, or do they show us things as the characters recall them or wish they happened? |
I think D&C have said that the flashes are what actually happened not some false/altered memory.
Anyone else heard that or do I have a false memory ?
_________________
Mark B.
<insert slightly amusing one liner or meaningful famous quote here > |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
